1. IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Members are encouraged to install GOM or HOLA or TUNNELBEAR for an added layer of protection.  The SEX forum is HERE so please stop asking.

CPF is NOT a Pension Fund

Discussion in 'Emigration Matters [no rep deductions]' started by Georgie5, Jun 17, 2015.

  1. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Official data from Statistics New Zealand which shows in a one square kilometre area of Auckland central west - bordered by Queen St - there were 550 victims of assaults, sexual attacks and robberies in 2015.

    Read more: http://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/vio...--liquor-store-owner-2016081616#ixzz4HUS80ojT


    Mr Wu also believed the punishment for robberies wasn't tough enough, particularly for young offenders.
    Police are investigating????????????????


    Read more: http://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/vio...--liquor-store-owner-2016081616#ixzz4HUSm1Rtd
     
  2. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Radio NZ revealed today that at least five of the nine default KiwiSaver providers invest in anti-personnel mine and cluster bomb manufacturers, despite it being illegal for government agencies to invest in them themselves.

    https://e2nz.org/2016/08/20/kiwisaver-or-how-to-invest-in-land-mines-and-cluster-bombs/

    Note: The Kiwisaver is a mirror of the Singapore CPF Savings Fund, both from employee and employer contributions. The NZ government does not take the Kiwisaver savings (not ruled a deductible by the immoral Chief Executive of WINZ), but confiscates the CPF Savings of only Singaporeans, but not other nationalities who have been refunded in full their CPF money by the Singapore CPF Board - DISCRIMINATION against Singaporeans by the NZ government.
    And the NZ PM who had collected his CPF tax-free, claims to have a strong relationship with Singapore - with friends like this, who needs enemies? Why then, would GIC invest Singaporeans' CPF savings in NZ overblown property bubble - spending $1.2 billion in a couple of years?
     
  3. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    "The perception that New Zealand is heaven is fast becoming one that it is hell. The country is seen as being a heaven only for criminals because of the soft action against them."

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11698917

    "A woman came into the restaurant shouting 'f**ing Asian' and later wrestled me to the ground," Li said.
     
  4. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    When an airline is turned into a flying whorehouse…

    https://newzeelend.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/air-new-zealand-using-blow-up-dolls-to-fly-the-planes/

    A Snapchat video shows an Air New Zealand flight attendant spitting, with the caption 'Wish I could spit on passengers like this'.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/trave...ng-after-inappropriate-images-of-staff-leaked
     
  5. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Radio hosts convince John Key to pick up and fondle urinal soap while sitting in a cage

    https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new...air-prison-rape-joke-involving-prime-minister

    He said he did not pick up the rape connotation in the moment. "The stunt was a deliberate reference to prison rape".

    MediaWorks has been ordered to pay $1000 to the Crown.
     
  6. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Father and son fight off low-life robbers

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/video.cfm?c_id=1&gal_cid=1&gallery_id=164752

    These scum-bags have no respect for people who work long hours to earn an honest living.
     
  7. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6

    NZLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback
    Social Security Appeal Authority of New Zealand

    You are here: NZLII >> Databases >> Social Security Appeal Authority of New Zealand >> 2015 >> [2015] NZSSAA 100
    Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help
    An appeal against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee [2015] NZSSAA 100 (11 December 2015)

    Last Updated: 18 August 2016

    This decision has been temporarily removed.


    WHY HAS IT BEEN REMOVED? CENSORED! IF NZ DISCRIMINATES AGAINST SINGAPOREANS, WHY HIDE WHAT IS FREELY AVAILABLE ON THE WWW? SHOW THE WORLD HOW NZ'S TRUMPETING OF HUMAN RIGHTS THAT THERE IS NO DISCRIMINATION IN NZ IS ALL A LIE. DO NOT HIDE BEHIND A FACADE OF DISHONESTY AND NON-TRANSPARENCY. TRANSPARENCY IS THE CORE VALUE OF ACCOUNTABILITY.
     
  8. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Who is this UNFAIR person who discriminates against Singaporeans? - http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-pos...erty/8864917/Lawyer-ordered-to-refund-tenants
     
  9. syed putra

    syed putra Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,046
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
  10. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    65-year-old Malaysian lady brutally bashed up by two teenage girls -

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11710148 and

    Nancy Voon, 65, was attacked while waiting for her son outside the Panmure YMCA around midday today.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11709885
     
  11. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
  12. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Another Singaporean discriminated by NZ government's ChauPerson

    http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZSSAA/2016/58.html

    Read this quickly before it is taken down to hide their discrimination against Singaporeans. In NZ your savings become an "allowance" according to the dishonesty of interpretation of the English language. The CPF savings of thousands of New Zealanders who worked in Singapore and had collected their CPF (including John Key, NZ Prime Minister) are not defined as pensions but the CPF savings of Singaporeans are defined as pensions by the NZ Oxford Dictionary.

    It is not unusual that she had been convicted of UNFAIRNESS and had to refund money to her tenant - http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-pos...erty/8864917/Lawyer-ordered-to-refund-tenants
     
  13. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Hey all, have you seen this posted on Lee Hsien Loong's timeline?


    An appeal against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee [2016] NZSSAA 58 (16 June 2016)
    nzlii.org

    Dear Mr Lee,

    Why do you allow New Zealand to discriminate against Singaporeans? NZ puts pressure on Singaporeans to give up their Singapore Citizenship otherwise the NZ govt confiscates the monthly refund of Singaporeans' CPF Savings. You must have noticed recently, many Singaporeans in New Zealand rushing to give up their citizenship to withdraw their CPF Savings before they reach 65.

    The NZ SSAA defines Singaporeans' CPF as pensions -

    http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZSSAA/2016/58.html

    ["The contributions made by the appellant to the CPF are compulsory as a result of legislation enacted by the Singapore Government. The way in which the funds can be accessed or paid out is also controlled by the Singapore Government. A true private savings scheme would not have these restrictions.

    [24] It is clear that the use of the words “benefit, pension or periodical allowance” in s 70 is intended to capture a wide variety of periodic payments that might be received from an overseas country from programmes for income support which meet the criteria of s 70.

    [25] The payment at issue in this appeal is a payment the appellant is entitled to receive monthly, but she says she has elected to receive it quarterly. It is a periodical payment. The New Zealand Oxford Dictionary defines “allowance” as:

    1. an amount or sum allowed to a person, esp. regularly for a stated purpose.

    [26] The amount received by the appellant is paid periodically and is payable on the appellant attaining a particular age. It is intended by the Singapore Government primarily to replace income on retirement or old age. We are in no doubt the payment the appellant receives constitutes a periodical allowance.

    [27] The New Zealand Oxford dictionary defines “pension” as:

    a regular payment made by a government to people above a specified age, to widows or to the disabled.
    The payments made to the appellant also readily fall within the commonly understood meaning of “pension”. ]

    Don't you think the CPF funds in the Singapore CPF Board will be in the red if everyone give up their citizenship due to pressure and discrimination?

    And your Minister who went to New Zealand for the TPP signing claimed New Zealand and Singapore are 'good' friends and that the two countries have strong relationships?

    Who needs friends like this - discriminatory against Singaporeans, who choose to retain their Singapore citizenship?

    The Singapore embassy is doing nothing for Singaporeans - where is the slogan, "With you, for you........."
     
  14. CPFscam

    CPFscam Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    JUSTICE as HONESTY, TRUTH and FAIRNESS

    Dear honest, decent and upright folks,

    Let me dissect this UNFAIR and DISHONEST Grounds of Decision -

    A. [ The way in which the funds can be accessed or paid out is also controlled by the Singapore Government.]
    It is true that Singaporeans' CPF savings are controlled by the Singapore Government - a government that discriminates against its own citizens and only refunds in full the CPF savings of non-citizens, all nationalities who are not Singapore citizens. Singapore citizens are refunded MONTHLY after the age of 65 until their CPF savings are depleted - and then there is none; yet this woman ruled that the CPF savings are benefits, pensions and periodic allowances!

    B. [A true private savings scheme would not have these restrictions.]
    A true private savings scheme would not be hijacked and the rules changed at will by a truly democratic government - so the New Zealand government is agreeing with the Singapore autocratic government? What the does it make the New Zealand government - in cahoots with the PAP to hijack the personal savings of Singaporeans?

    C. [[24] It is clear that the use of the words “benefit, pension or periodical allowance” in s 70 is intended to capture a wide variety of periodic payments ]
    This dumb woman does not understand that REFUNDs are NOT PERIODIC PAYMENTS!

    D. [[25] The payment at issue in this appeal is a payment the appellant is entitled to receive monthly, but she says she has elected to receive it quarterly. It is a periodical payment.]
    This dumb woman again does not understand the true and honest meaning of PAYMENT.

    E.[ The New Zealand Oxford Dictionary defines “allowance” as:
    1. an amount or sum allowed to a person, esp. regularly for a stated purpose.]
    She now has the audacity to quote from the NZ Oxford Dictionary to suit her UNFAIR Grounds of Decision judgment - is your own savings an ALLOWANCE? What is the TRUTH? This is New Zealand JUSTICE?

    F. [[26] The amount received by the appellant is paid periodically and is payable on the appellant attaining a particular age. It is intended by the Singapore Government primarily to replace income on retirement or old age.]
    Your personal savings from your employee and employer contributions replaces income? What kind of logic is this? She also knows the intention of the Singapore Government? What do you think is the real intention of the Singapore Government?

    G. [We are in no doubt the payment the appellant receives constitutes a periodical allowance.]
    This is confirmation of a dishonest and unfair statement as it is self-confirmation of an UNTRUTHFUL situation.

    H. [[27] The New Zealand Oxford dictionary defines “pension” as:
    a regular payment made by a government to people above a specified age, to widows or to the disabled.]
    Indeed, a "pension" is a regular payment from the government treasury made by a government; not a regular REFUND of your own savings controlled by a vitiated government - what a lying, deceitful statement and a disgrace to the New Zealand Ministry of Justice for allowing this to be published internationally! Is this not DISCRIMINATION by NATIONALITY, which is unlawful under the 1993 New Zealand Human Rights Act?

    I. [The payments made to the appellant also readily fall within the commonly understood meaning of “pension”.]
    The REFUNDS are NOT PAYMENTS - readily fall within the commonly understood meaning of "pension" - is English in New Zealand different from English Language internationally? "Commonly understood" - oh, really?
    Another confirmatory bias from this barrister, role-playing as a Judge under the New Zealand Ministry of Justice.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-pos...erty/8864917/Lawyer-ordered-to-refund-tenants

    The continued DISCRIMINATION of Singaporeans by these slanted definitions (according to the New Zealand Oxford Dictionary which is also an insult to the publishers of The Oxford Dictionary) and the UNTRUTHFUL Grounds of Decision is a dire affront to the word JUSTICE, which stands for honesty, truth and fairness above all self-interests and self-serving Chief Executives whose bonuses are linked to how much they can rob the entitlements of the old and vulnerable.

    On a FINAL NOTE, only Singaporeans are discriminated by this woman (already convicted of unfairness against her poor tenant) whose ruling that CPF savings are "pensions, benefits and allowances" when her own Prime Minister John Key already had his Singapore CPF TAX-FREE savings safely in his personal bank account, as well as all nationalities who had worked in Singapore.

    Is New Zealand a FAIR, JUST and HONEST society, 100% PURE?

    You be the JUDGE - :rolleyes:
     
  15. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    John Key: Hotel shortage so bad his staff struggle to get a bed

    John Key said, "If you go to Singapore and you pay your hotel bill, it's always plus, plus, plus."

    What is wrong with this guy? First of all, he worked in Merrill Lynch Singapore and made his millions. Then he withdrew and collected TAX-FREE his CPF savings when he left Singapore. Then he allows his Chief Executive to steal CPF savings of only Singaporeans. Then he now puts down Singapore (plus, plus, plus) as he wants to introduce new taxes on tourists - what is his beef with Singapore?:confused:

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11744897
     
  16. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    He made his millions in Merrill-Lynch Singapore - as the Malay proverb says, "Sa-bagai kachang lupakan kulit" i.e. the peanut has forgotten its shell/skin.

    He grew up in a state house - now he is selling off state houses - Andrew Little (Opposition Leader), who said the minister was using "weasel words".

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11754328

    Little said it was "complete bollocks" to be selling off state houses at a time when an estimated 41,000 people were homeless.:(
     
  17. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    "WITH YOU, FOR YOU, FUCK YOU...."

    Singapore returns the CPF savings of its citizens in monthly instalments BUT New Zealand steals it outright 100%; but does not touch their Prime Minister’s CPF savings, ex-Singaporeans’ CPF savings, Malaysians’ CPF savings or Filipinos’ CPF savings. IN OTHER WORDS, NEW ZEALAND PRESSURES SINGAPORE CITIZENS TO GIVE UP THEIR CITIZENSHIPS – so why is the Singapore government allowing the New Zealand government to reduce the coffers of the CPF department? Why is the Singapore government not protesting against this blatant discrimination against Singapore citizens in New Zealand but instead lecturing China about some rocky outposts in the South China Sea, which even the Filipinos are not interested about China taking over these rocks? Or moaning about the dead-duck TPP at APEC in Peru which the Donald had announced is already buried? Why remain curiously silent and not stand up for Singapore citizens? – “For you, with you, fuck you – go and fight your own battles and stand up for Singaporeans’ rights on your own and at your expense?”

    https://cpfisnotapensionfund.wordpress.com/:(
     
  18. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    BREAKING NEWS - Prime Minister John Key resigns


    Why did he resign?

    "I've taken the knife to some other people, and now I've taken the knife to myself'"

    He has disgraced the name of New Zealand by not doing the RIGHT THING -
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzKmweCzn4Y&feature=youtu.be AND
    http://www.newshub.co.nz/…/john-key-steps-down-pm-2016120512

    Read the seven letters to him, pleading that he does the right thing - instead, he allows his Chief Executive to discriminate against one nationality by TAXING 100% their CPF savings because he had already collected his CPF savings from the Singapore government TAX-FREE - https://cpfisnotapensionfund.wordpress.com/2016/01/

    Stepping down is certainly doing the right thing for blemishing the name of New Zealand.:D

    The Chief Executive of Ministry of Social Development should also fall down on his sword because he was the instigator of this discrimination against one nationality and is the cause of John Key's downfall FOR NOT DOING THE RIGHT THING - after all, watch the news video - John Key's voice was emotional and broken up - did he resign on his own accord? Who would want to resign if you are at the top of the National dungheap - nothing could shake his popularity - not increased homelessness, not inflated house prices, not poorer health services, not rampant burglaries, rapes, assaults and the closing of police stations throughout the country, NOTHING!

    WHAT DO YOU THINK?
     
  19. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    CONFIRMED - Straight from the horses's mouth - New Zealand DISCRIMINATES against SINGAPOREANS

    Another SIngaporean discriminated by the Chief Executive of the NZ Ministry of Social Development.

    Read her biased and unfair Grounds of Decision before it is removed and covered up - http://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Decisions/2016-NZSSAA-057-16-June-2016.pdf

    The unfair and biased Referee of the Tribunal said, "The answer, however, is not to
    exempt all payments from the CPF from the s 70 deduction regime." What does this mean since only Singaporeans are refunded their own CPF savings monthly (while all other nationalities who had worked in Singapore are refunded in full in one lump sum, including NZ's EX-Prime Minister, John Key)? It means all CPF refunds to Singaporeans are TAXED 100% by the NZ government! It means other nationalities collect their CPF savings TAX-FREE, like John Key.

    How fair is this woman barrister - http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-pos...erty/8864917/Lawyer-ordered-to-refund-tenants

    By the way, this Chairwoman of the Tribunal has also been retired, like John Key - to save the evil face of NZ Discrimination.:rolleyes:
     
  20. Georgie5

    Georgie5 Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    In yet another landmark case proving that foreigners and rich have their way in Singapore, the Singapore Court yesterday (Dec 20) awarded a S$57 compensation to a Singaporean teacher who was viciously attacked by a New Zealand company director, Stefan Paul Afendoulis.

    http://statestimesreview.com/2016/1...orean-victim-for-vicious-attack-by-foreigner/

    A mighty ang moh, Stefan Paul Afendoulis, 48, a former New Zealander who is now a Singapore permanent resident, attempted to strangle Singaporean teacher Mr Toh Peng Hwee in a fast-food restaurant two years ago. Stefan works as a company director.

    https://www.allsingaporestuff.com/a...cher-after-accidental-bump-let-hook-2500-fine

    Facebook/Jentrified Citizen/ Min Zheng - "Was justice served? This chao PR throttled a man by grabbing his neck and pushing him against the wall and hurting the victim. The PR did this after he collided with the victim while he (the jerk) was engrossed with his handphone. His penalty as imposed by the court? Pay the victim a derisory $57 for his medical bill and pay a $2500 fine. And all this despite him being unremorseful. This jerk even boasted arrogantly at the assault scene he was wealthy enough to hire a lawyer. #justiceisgrey #lifeisunfair"
    :*:[/url]

    The government gets $2,500 but the victim of assault gets $57 only ??????????
    "Singapore District Judge Luke Tan let the rich New Zealander off without a jail sentence for the attack. To add salt to the victim’s plight, District Judge Luke Tan fined the company director S$2,500 – a fraction of the director’s salary – and awarded only S$57 for the victim’s suffering. The prosecution, Deputy Public Prosecutor Michael Quilindo, did not contest the judgment."
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2016

Share This Page